comparison pregnancy outcomes between minimal stimulation protocol and conventional gnrh antagonist protocols in poor ovarian responders

Authors

shamim pilehvari reproductive health research center, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran

ensieh shahrokh tehraninejad reproductive health research center, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran

batool hosseinrashidi reproductive health research center, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran

fatemeh keikhah reproductive health research center, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran

abstract

objective: to compare the pregnancy outcomes achieved by in vitro fertilization (ivf) between minimal stimulation and conventional antagonist protocols in poor ovarian responders (pors). materials and methods: in this randomized controlled trial, 77 pors undergoing ivf were selected and divided into two groups. first group was the minimal stimulation group (n = 42) receiving 100 mg/day clomiphene citrate on day 2of the cycle for 5 day that was followed by150iu/day human menopausal gonadotropin (hmg) on day 5 of the cycle. second group was the conventional group (n = 35) receiving at least 300 iu/daygonadotropin on day 2 of the cycle. gonadotropin-releasing hormone (gnrh) antagonist protocol was applied for both groups according to flexible protocol. number of retrieved oocytes and chemical pregnancy rate were the main outcomes. results: there was no difference in number ofretrieved oocyte and pregnancy rate (2.79 ± 1.96 vs. 2.20 ± 1.71 and 5.6% vs. 4.1%; p > 0.05) between both groups. the gonadotropin dose used in the minimal stimulation group was lower than conventional group (1046 ± 596 vs. 2806 ± 583). conclusion: minimal stimulation protocol with lower gonadotropin used is likely to be considered as a patient- friendly and cost-effective substitute for pors.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Comparison Pregnancy Outcomes Between Minimal Stimulation Protocol and Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders

OBJECTIVE To compare the pregnancy outcomes achieved by in vitro fertilization (IVF) between minimal stimulation and conventional antagonist protocols in poor ovarian responders (PORs). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this randomized controlled trial, 77 PORs undergoing IVF were selected and divided into two groups. First group was the minimal stimulation group (n = 42) receiving 100 mg/day clomiphe...

full text

Comparison of the standard GnRH antagonist protocol and the luteal phase estradiol/GnRH antagonist priming protocol in poor ovarian responders.

BACKGROUND/AIM The aim of the study was to compare the luteal estradiol patch/GnRH antagonists priming protocol (LPP) with the standard GnRH antagonist protocol in poor ovarian responders (PORs) in terms of the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS IVF outcomes of 265 cycles in 265 patients (106 in the LPP group, 159 in the standard GnRH antagonist group) w...

full text

Letrozole+ GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: An RCT

BACKGROUND Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol has been proposed as a potentially proper option for the patients with limited ovarian reserve. Nevertheless, there is no significant difference in terms of clinical pregnancy between the GnRH antagonist and agonist cycles. The use of aromatase inhibitors such as letrozole was suggested by some studies. OBJECTIVE The object ...

full text

Comparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF.

BACKGROUND In view of the discrepancies about the GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant) ovarian stimulation protocols having some potential advantages compared with the GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) protocols in poor ovarian responders IVF/ICSI, a meta-analysis of the published data was performed to compare the efficacy of GnRH-ant versus GnRH-a protocols for ovarian stimulation in IVF poor response patients. M...

full text

Pregnancy outcome of “delayed start” GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders: A clinical trial study

BACKGROUND Management of poor-responding patients is still major challenge in assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Delayed-start GnRH antagonist protocol is recommended to these patients, but little is known in this regards. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was assessment of delayed-start GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. MATERIALS AN...

full text

Comparison of long GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders

OBJECTIVE To compare long GnRH agonist with GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders. MATERIALS AND METHODS Medical charts of 531 poor responder women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle at Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Children's Hospital, IVF Center were retrospectively analysed. Those who received at least 300 IU/daily gonadotropin and had ≤3 oocytes retrieved were enrolled in th...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later


Journal title:
journal of family and reproductive health

جلد ۱۰، شماره ۱، صفحات ۳۵-۴۱

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023